How this payout log is funded

This site is free to read, with no subscription and no paywall — which does not make it free to run. posido.info sustains itself through partner links, and it states that on a page of its own rather than in a footnote. For a publication whose entire subject is when and under what conditions money moves, that disclosure is not optional: a reader is entitled to know where the editorial team’s own money comes from.

The mechanism

Links leading to the operator carry a tracking code. If a reader follows such a link and later opens an account, the partner programme may pay the portal a commission. Nothing about this costs the reader anything: the deposit minimum is still 5 000 Ft, the withdrawal floor is still 10 000 Ft, and the terms are identical to those that would apply had the operator’s site been opened directly.

Partner reporting is aggregated. The editorial team sees how many clicks and how many account openings occurred — not who deposited, how much, what they played or what they withdrew. The portal has no access to player data at all, as recorded in the privacy notice.

What the revenue may not touch

A commercial interest does not distort a publication by existing; it distorts one when nobody has drawn the boundary around it. Four things are outside that boundary under any circumstances.

• The published timings. The approval median — 2–12 hours on weekdays, 6–24 hours at weekends and on public holidays — comes from measurement rather than from marketing material, and it is not rounded downwards.
• The shortcomings. The one-way nature of paysafecard, the missing return path on many cards, the document set requested at the first payout and the poor visibility of bonus weighting appear on the site exactly as prominently as the strengths.
• The weighting of criteria. The five cashier criteria used in the review carry equal weight, and that weighting does not shift towards whichever aspect the operator handles best.
• The warnings. The risk of lookalike domains, the danger of installers from unknown sources and the correct payout order before self-exclusion stay in place even when reading them discourages a registration.

Why commission cannot speed up a payout

This is the most common misunderstanding, so it is worth saying plainly: a partner relationship gives the editorial team no influence over how the cashier operates. A withdrawal consists of three segments — approval at the operator, dispatch by the payment provider, crediting on the receiving side — and none of them can be reached from outside. There is no priority lane, no expedited handling, and no way for a publisher to move a pending request. The timetable is on the withdrawals page and the route for disputes on the complaints page.

How a reader can check

Nobody should have to take a statement of intent on trust; what matters is whether the data can be verified. Three routes exist. The operator’s published terms and limits are available to anyone and can be compared against the figures quoted here. The register of licensed gambling organisers and the list of sites made inaccessible are maintained by the Szabályozott Tevékenységek Felügyeleti Hatósága (SZTFH) — a supervisory rather than commercial source. And a single small deposit followed by one withdrawal request turns the question into a personal measurement, whose timestamps can be set against the medians published here.

Labelling, age and corrections

Partner links are not disguised as editorial recommendations: they appear as buttons or clearly marked links, and their purpose is evident from the surrounding text. The content is intended for readers aged 18 and over; limit-setting and the central exclusion register are covered under responsible gambling. Where a figure on this site differs from what a reader experiences at the cashier, that is worth reporting — the measurement log is reviewed and the number corrected. The method is described on the about page, the analyst on the author page, and the conditions of use in the terms.